Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. Howard

PETITIONER:Nitro-Lift Technologies LLC
RESPONDENT:Eddie Lee Howard and Shane D. Schneider
LOCATION: District Court of Johnson County

DOCKET NO.: 11-1377
DECIDED BY: Roberts Court (2010-2016)
LOWER COURT: Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CITATION: 568 US (2012)
GRANTED: Nov 26, 2012
DECIDED: Nov 26, 2012

Facts of the case

Eddie Lee Howard and Shane D. Schneider worked for Nitro-Lift Technologies LLC. As a condition of employment, they entered into confidentiality and noncompetition agreements that contained a clause requiring any dispute between Nitro-Lift and its employees to be settled in arbitration. When Howard and Schneider quit, they went to work for one of Nitro-Lift’s competitors. Nitro-Lift demanded arbitration for breach of the noncompetition agreements. Howard and Schneider sued in the District Court of Johnson County, Oklahoma, asking the court to declare their noncompetition agreements null and void. The court dismissed the case, holding that the agreements contained a valid arbitration clause, so the arbitrator had to settle any dispute between the parties. On appeal, Nitro-Lift cited several U.S. Supreme Court cases interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), noting that the law favoring arbitration applied in both federal and state cases. Despite this, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed, holding that the existence of an arbitration clause did not prohibit judicial review of the underlying agreement. The court went on to find the noncompetition agreements “void and unenforceable as against Oklahoma’s public policy.”


Did the Oklahoma Supreme Court err in preventing the arbitration of the non competition agreement?