Why is the case important?The Petitioner, Schlagenhauf (Petitioner), was one of several named defendants in a negligence lawsuit... Continued
Case Briefs - 1964
Why is the case important?An individual was convicted of armed robbery after a jury trial. Various items were taken from his hotel... Continued
Why is the case important?A districting scheme that was based on an outdated census and that had a practical effect of... Continued
Why is the case important?"The bills of lading for a shipment of sugar contracted between Farr, Whitlock & Co an American... Continued
Why is the case important?Petitioner was recorded by a co-conspirator with the aid of the authorities. Evidence was... Continued
PETITIONER:Zemel RESPONDENT:RuskLOCATION:Louisiana General AssemblyDOCKET NO.: 86DECIDED BY: Warren Court (1962-1965)LOWER... Continued
PETITIONER:Whitney National Bank in Jefferson ParishRESPONDENT:Bank of New Orleans & Trust CompanyLOCATION:United States Post... Continued
PETITIONER:Waterman Steamship Corporation RESPONDENT:United StatesLOCATION:United States Post Office and CourthouseDOCKET NO.:... Continued
PETITIONER:Warren Trading Post CompanyRESPONDENT:Arizona Tax CommissionLOCATION:Criminal District Court, Parish of New... Continued
PETITIONER:Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade RESPONDENT:Subversive Activities Control BoardLOCATION:Point of picking up... Continued
