Facts of the CaseThe staff and students brought a class action, seeking to declare unconstitutional two Washington statutes. The... Continued
Case Briefs - 1964
Facts of the Case"Petitioners, Negro "sit-in" demonstrators, were asked to leave a Baltimore restaurant solely because of their... Continued
Facts of the CaseDuring a dispute with the judges of the Criminal District Court of the Parish of New Orleans, the district... Continued
Facts of the Case"A Texas justice of the peace issued a warrant to search for narcotics in defendant's... Continued
Why is the case important?The Petitioner, Schlagenhauf (Petitioner), was one of several named defendants in a negligence lawsuit... Continued
Why is the case important?An individual was convicted of armed robbery after a jury trial. Various items were taken from his hotel... Continued
Why is the case important?A districting scheme that was based on an outdated census and that had a practical effect of... Continued
Why is the case important?"The bills of lading for a shipment of sugar contracted between Farr, Whitlock & Co an American... Continued
Why is the case important?Petitioner was recorded by a co-conspirator with the aid of the authorities. Evidence was... Continued
PETITIONER:Zemel RESPONDENT:RuskLOCATION:Louisiana General AssemblyDOCKET NO.: 86DECIDED BY: Warren Court (1962-1965)LOWER... Continued
