Pojman’s Why the Death Penalty is Morally Permissible Essay

Louis P. Pojman is a Doctor of Philosophy and is currently a professor of Philosophy at the United States Military Academy. On top of this, Pojman is also a visiting professor at the Birmingham Young University in Utah and a visiting fellow at Oxford University in New York. Apart from the article he had contributed in the book Debating the Death Penalty: should America have the Capital Punishment? The Eperts on Both Sides Make their Best Case which has been edited by Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G.

Cassell (2004), Pojman has also published numerous books on Philosophy as well as a number of different ethical topics pertaining to life and death issues. As the title of the article implies, the contents of the article aims to discuss the various reasons as to why the capital punishment can be considered as a moral form of punishment to be imposed to individuals who have been found guilty of heinous crimes.

The article presented Pojman’s position with regards to the use of capital punishment in the United States. Many of the points and arguments presented by Pojman (2004) were derived from an essay that he had published with Jeffrey Reiman entitled For the Death Penalty in the book entitled Death Penalty: For and Against. While this was established by Pojman at the beginning of the essay, this was stated as a footnote which could be easily ignored.

The information presented by Pojman in the essay provides a number of viable arguments that may be utilized for the position paper supporting the use of the capital punishment in the United States that would be written. However, since the points mentioned in the article only encompasses one particular aspect as to why the use of the capital punishment should be supported, additional supporting information should be used to support the information provided.