Media Should Report Facts about Rape

The press can only stop rape culture by stating facts and not exempting rape coverages. Since the media are the primary source of information regarding sexual assaults and crime for the public majority through covering a variety of events linked to rape, the media will assist in creating a better understanding of the meaning of sexual assault and why it is insupportable. The method promotes public attitude not to tolerate this sexual violence.

With the vast data circulating concerning sexual violence, it can be complex differing amongst reality and myths. Therefore considering the responsibility played by media in establishing an understanding of the issues, it’s essential that media displays facts which are unbiased and goal oriented.

Rape culture or rape is a complicated and critical issue, and broadcasting it can cause problems. For instance, it can be hard to distinguish amid various sexual crimes and create a sense of the statistics available. The media helps by providing featured articles on the primary causes and the people as well as social problems of sexual offenses; media then assists the public in gaining a more magnificent glimpse of the rape culture. Hence, the public will likely identify sexual assault as a societal issue than a virtuously private concern (Armstrong, Cory, and Jessica 15).

Broadcasting Resources

Through the discussion of assistance the defense of victims and available resources, the broadcast apt victims assault, individuals who have, or fear to possess, sexually destructive characters as well as their friends and families to turn and benefit resources.

When the media speaks about the resources, the media will break down the myths that rape is a personal issue which should be solely managed by concerned persons, explicitly, the victims, their friends and family, and the culprits. Hence media can contribute to decreasing victims and suspect’s perception of being solitary and incapable of finding assistance (Armstrong, Cory and Jessica 8).


This term was created by Kimberle Crenshaw in 1980s. However, the concept was established by women feminist of color in the 19th and 20th centuries. This concept is complex, nowhere moreover when it is applied to sexual assaults on campus. Captivating an inter-sectional method to sexual vehemence means understanding that the perception of a commonly skilled campus rape culture is insufficient since it squashes out the very different orders of power which are enthusiastic by and contributes to sexual assaults (Collins, Patricia, and Sirma 5).

Therefore we have to contextualize sexual assaults diversely relative to color, homophobia, and structures which are already constituted in the university as an organization. Sexual assaults take place in an institutional context which is inaccessible, violent, or hostile to color communities, poor societies, and refugees and immigrant societies. These structures render specific students, faculty, and staff susceptible to different types of assaults. This doesn’t mean that the focus is mainly on violation between particular populace other than others. Somehow, we can say a method that assumes that all sexual violence experiences have common denominator follow conventional narrative discreetly provides priority to those that fit tale best as well as marginalizing those that are susceptible (Collins, Patricia, and Sirma 10).

Moreover, rather than assuming that a university is an unbiased institution, we should understand how rape isn’t a deviation but instead a likely impact of the functions of the university. The intersectionality method borrows from the feminist women color analysis, which individualizes sexual assaults, for instance, the basis essay ‘rape racism and the myth of the black’ (Collins, Patricia, and Sirma 15). The other approach of anticerebral approach relies mostly on the feminism and racism as well as right immigrant activists and scholars, observing reactions to gender-based and sexual violence which depend on policing and criminalization rendering their societies and the females more vulnerable to damage. Several, policies established by colleges to address gender-based and sexual violence emphasizes on the legal procedure of evidence or proof by offering just punishment to the individual suspect as the only remedy.

Researchers state that history, uses and title abuse, personal sexual persecutions, and violence claims are never understood as entrenched in the broader social subtleties within and out of campus. The segmented method to sex judgment, encourages legalistic and partial examines of scope and nature of the issue, thus obscuring biases based on sexual orientation, race and gender character can be avoided and also propagated by a narrow view of gender impartiality. Lastly, impunity isn’t opposed to culture penalty; however, it is a constitutive repercussion. This is because titles of individuals like professors interfere with the justice process (Collins, Patricia, and Sirma 25-30).

Current Events Related to Rape

An alleged rape case and sexual assault investigation involving a French movie star called Gerard Depardieu were left on a Tuesday with claims of it lacking incriminatory proof. The inquiry on Mr. Depardieu, seventy years was commenced in August last year after a teenage actress blamed him of assaulting her sexually on two occurrences the very month at his house in Paris. The French new reported that Mr. Depardieu took the actress a 20-year-old below his wings and provided her with career advice. The identified female, according to French authorities, suspected Mr. Depardieu of raping her in an informal rehearsal for a cinema production (Gerard Depardieu’s 2019).