Ethics in Criminology

The officers of the law enforcement functions as an official representative of government who is trusted and required to work within the law. All of them must be totally conscious with the ethical accountabilities of their position and must constantly make every effort to live up to the utmost possible standard of proficient policing. The basic responsibilities of a police officer consist of serving the community; defending the innocent; protecting property and lives; maintaining the peace; and guaranteeing the rights of all to equality, liberty, and impartiality.

However, throughout the past few years, law enforcement conduct has been the topic of increased examination across the United States. With every latest news in the front pages, doubt to the law enforcement increases; community and police relations suffer; and the standings of hardworking, superior and ethical professionals of the law enforcement and their organizations are contaminated. Law enforcement agencies across the United States put up with issues of worthiness that has to be changed and examined.

Even the most passionate followers of law enforcement surely speculate what is happening to the organization. Overview of Ethics in the Law Enforcement According to the enforcement’s code of ethics: law enforcement officers’ primary responsibility is to serve mankind; to protect their property and lives, to safeguard the innocent against corruption, the weak against intimidation or oppression, and the peaceful against disorder or violence; and to value the Constitutional rights of all men to justice, equality and liberty (University of California, 2008, p. 1).

They must keep their private life unblemished as a model to all, preserve courageous composure in the face of ridicule, scorn, or danger; develop self-discipline; and be persistently aware of the interests of others (University of California, 2008, p. 1). Law enforcement officers must be truthful in deed and thought in both their official and personal life. No matter what they hear or see of a classified nature or that is confined to them in their official capacity must be maintained undisclosed unless disclosure is necessary in the performance of their responsibility.

Additionally, law enforcement officers must not take steps officially or allow personal animosities, prejudices, friendship or feelings to pressure their judgements. With no concession for crime and with unyielding prosecution of wrongdoers, they must enforce the law appropriately and courteously without favour of fear, ill will or malice, never using unnecessary violence or force and by no means accept gratuities (University of California, 2008, p. 1).

They must acknowledge the symbol of their office as a representation of public faith, and they must further recognize it as a public trust to be assumed as long as they are honest to the ethics of the police service. Finally, law enforcement officers must continually strive to accomplish the aforesaid ideals and objectives. Even though persons in official life find the code of ethics valuable, yet the guidelines do not encourage people to behave properly (Delattre, 2002, p. 33).

The guidelines assist only those individuals who already want to do so. Public office holders, the police for instance, need to legitimately want to serve the public and to become excellent at their job. They cannot get rid of self-interest from their lives, nor can they be foolproof. But they must be sensibly superior in character, and they must know their undertaking and be dedicated to it. Both codes of ethics and individual character must be encouraged by the demeanour of command personnel and department policies (Delattre, 2002, p. 33).

Even when people are righteous, and act with high standards of principles, they benefit from conscientious instruction and supervision designed to facilitate them become better. They deserve peers and superiors who gauge their performance with concern and make departmental expectations comprehensible. If the experienced personnel and the leadership do not demonstrate that they take ethics infringements sincerely, their codes will be treated as insignificant boredoms.