Case Briefs – 1974

Facts of the CaseUnder the federal-state programs of Aid to the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (AABD) Illinois public aid officials… Continued

Facts of the CasePetitioner was an odd lot trader of securities. Respondents were brokerage firms used by petitioner and others…. Continued

Facts of the CaseDefendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape while armed, armed assault on a police officer, and… Continued

Facts of the Case”Corning Glass Works, which operates plants both in New York and in Pennsylvania, paid its night inspectors, who… Continued

Facts of the CaseDefendant Perry was in prison when he got into a fight with another inmate. Perry was charged with the… Continued

Why is the case important?Levy (Respondent) is an Army physician who is being court-martialed for making disparaging statements… Continued

Why is the case important?A crucial prosecution witness to in a robbery trial was a juvenile with a record of delinquency. The… Continued

Why is the case important?After spending the night in jail, the Respondent’s, Edwards (Respondent), clothes were exchanged for… Continued

Why is the case important?”Curtis (Petitioner) brought a civil rights action under Section 812 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968… Continued

Why is the case important?Richardson, the Plaintiff-Respondent (Plaintiff) sued Congress. He alleged that public reporting under… Continued