Case Briefs – 1962

Facts of the CasePetitioners were brought to trial under a valid indictment in a Federal District Court which had jurisdiction… Continued

Facts of the CasePetitioner daughter filed an action alleging that she had cared for her mother in exchange for her father’s… Continued

Facts of the Case”Claiming that petitioner had breached its contract to pay $ 150,000 for the exclusive use of the trademark… Continued

Why is the case important?Petitioner, George Benjamin Ford, Jr. asserts that Respondent, Pearl Rose Ford is not entitled to obtain… Continued

PETITIONER:Nathaniel Wright et al. RESPONDENT:GeorgiaLOCATION:Beaumont MillsDOCKET NO.: 68DECIDED BY: Warren Court… Continued

PETITIONER: Irving J. Wolf et al.RESPONDENT:Arnold A. Weinstein et al.LOCATION:Beaumont MillsDOCKET NO.: 70DECIDED BY: Warren… Continued

PETITIONER:Wong Sun and James Wah Toy RESPONDENT:United StatesLOCATION:James Wah Toy’s LaundryDOCKET NO.: 36DECIDED BY: Warren… Continued

PETITIONER:Wisconsin RESPONDENT:Federal Power CommissionLOCATION:Beaumont MillsDOCKET NO.: 72DECIDED BY: Warren Court… Continued

PETITIONER:WilliamsRESPONDENT:ZuckertLOCATION:Formerly S. H. Kress and Co.DOCKET NO.: 133DECIDED BY: Warren Court (1962-1965)LOWER… Continued

PETITIONER:WillnerRESPONDENT:Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First… Continued