Unequal Treaty

If  we were to discuss what Unequal Treaty means, we should look back at the historic context of this deed by the east countries when they experienced doing this kind of treaties with other forces at the other side of the globe. Where there exist a political and economic turmoil in each of the countries concerned that is why they are forced to use sudden intervention of their usual solution for and treaties signed by several East Asian countries and western powers in solution to answer the pressure brought to them by severe economic problems.

(Glenn, 2004) These treaties were characterized by the literally them to be able to cope up with it. An unequal treaty is a kind of consideration unequal trade of territories and other things from the western power but the eastern countries have no choice but to accept their offer. This produced greater problems for they undergone separation from their old territories and therefore run by other country with different nationalities.

This manifestation of having severe problems that affecting the wealth of the countries had brought up certain factors for them to give up some of their most influential and functioning territory that was being selected not by them but the western power that have the stronger influence compared to them. By doing such, many of those who experienced having trouble in their wealth and national assets had been forced to make way of giving a [portion of their land territory for the sole benefits of the other countries from its natural resources.

Although some of the proposed plans had tried to equalize the effects and the benefits of both parties involved in creating the treaties, however, most of the attempt of restoring the chances of having an egalitarian mutual treaties had been defunct primarily by the western proponents of the treaty. This manifestation of inequality had been seen throughout the historical data that shows the importance of such treaties in making the possibility of having a territorial approximation and even the legal basis of everything that should be done.

Since the effect of having the systematic change and the call of being part of a group where the persistence of having a quite drastic move of settling and claiming a part of the country resulted to drastic cultural distortion and identity confusion, the people had learned to demand the basic rights they should have because of their territorial heritage. Since it is one of the vital parts of the negotiation, both of the parties involved tried to maximize the benefit that they could get.

But assuming that the conflict between the two opposing power will only result to one party being inferior to the other, as obviously seen in the Unequal treaty or trade of the different countries, the more powerful country will have the opportunity of having the more beneficial term for them. (Glenn, 2004) One of the problems that can be accounted to this treaty is the unequal treatment of nationality that is mutually living in one vicinity when they were traded to other territory. Such changes had been seen as their way of escaping the tension from their own cultural identity and thus having a superior feeling towards their under men.

The people had been seen as treating their fellow country man as they should have to but the others with certain negative behavior and attitude to whom they regard as of lower class compared to them. This indifference with regards to the possibility of having discrimination within the societies change in their autonomous way of governing the people often leads to a varying knowledge and beliefs in connection with the personal biases set upon by the reigning community in which they interfered and try to locate their identity.

In viewing this scenario, a carefully handpicked concept can be drawn out as a representative of the oppressing power and the ideals of having a marginalized group within their own system and country. Most of the Asian countries had no choice left but to approve the sudden denudation of their rights and territorial power fro them not to suffer to become a colony of a specific power territory outside their domain. In protecting their territories, their decision on having a more legalized and certain immediate decision is needed for it not to affect the international relation they should have.