Significance of constitutional rights to public service

Public servants are expected to operate and work in line with the constitution of the state. Constitutionalism is about limiting public servants operations and their conduct to the dictates enshrined in the constitution. Thus, public servants is expected to be apolitical, render services without favoritism, operates under the scene. However, the rights of public servants should be observed as they perform their duty of nation building. Where there is obligation to be executed by workers, the rights of these workers are to be protected.

The presence of the constitutional right for public servants is there to ensure that public servants are protected physically and emotionally from harm and the security of tenure of office. The public service is known to have more job security than when compared with private sector organizations. The constitution tends to protect the rights of public and civil servants in ensuring workers appointment is not abruptly terminated, thus, the process for terminating an appointment of a public servant is spelt out by the constitution.

As the public servant perform their duties there welfare packages and regular payment of salary is ensured and guided by the constitution. At retirement, workers from the public service have the right to pension. All these constitutional rights are there to motivate public servants in executing their duties without fear or favor. This lead to the efficiency and effectiveness of public service performance in regards to continuity of government and nation building.

DIVERSITY WITHIN PUBLIC SERVICE HOW FEASIBLE The pronouncement made by Grutter & Gratz in their Supreme Court ruling on student body diversity can be applicable to the diversity in public service depending on the level of public service. In the American constitution the state public service operates autonomous and distinctively from the federal public service. The US constitution permits each state to operate its own public service along side that of the federal public service.

Thus, at the state level diversity pronounced by Grutter & Gratz in their Supreme Court for school body is applicable. In this case, each state in US can operate its public service different from what is constitutionally guided and stipulated for other state. In this instance, the central point of reference would be diversity in state public service in line with the peculiar need and culture of people within each state of the federation.