ReviewQuestionsWhenshouldajudgerecusehimselforherselffromacaseA judge should recuse

When should a judge recuse himself or herself from a case? A judge should recuse himself or herself from a case when he or she may be biased towards a certain party. For example if a party might be a company in whom the judge has invested heavily, if its a friend or family member or the judge may feel that, for personal reasons where she or he may not be able to act impartially in case. What kinds of court cases are heard by federal courts?

Name at least three. The kind of court cases that are heard by the federal courts is cases involving federal law, constitutional law or maritime law. How does the Supreme Court determine whether or not to hear a case? A Supreme Court determines whether or not to hear a case by using the Rule of Four. The indicates if if the four justice believe that case she be heard then, a writ of certiorari would be issued.

The writ is just a request for the lower courts to submit court records for the case review. The supreme court choices cases based on their potential impact on the constitutional law and the influences the case may have on the people. So the more your case impact people, it’s mostly going to be heard by the Supreme Court. So once they make their final decision they will establish a precedent. What is the difference between a fact witness and an expert witness?

The difference between a fact witness and an expert witness is that a fact witness only provides details and specific circumstances in a case while a expert witness provides insight on a case based on his or her sharing their expert knowledge of a subject based on their training and experiences. Explain the purpose and importance of a sidebar. The purpose of the sidebars is to determine whether a witness can be called or if a specific piece of evidence can be admitted because a piece of evidence could affect the verdict and may be unfair.

Critical Thinking Questions Do you think federal judges should be appointed for life? Why or why not? I believe federal judges shouldn’t be appointed for a lifetime because their should be a fair when choosing someone for these position, give newcomers a chance, well everyone deserve a chance and that’s why they should only have terms. Also, if the people doesn’t like the way he or she misbehaves they could impeach that individual. Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid? Why or why not?

I believe an expert witness should be paid because of their services to provide insights on the case based on their knowledge. They have spent so many years in school studying and training to obtain their knowledge. Who do you think is the most important person in the courtroom during a trial? Explain. The most important person in the courtroom during a trial is victim because without that individual we wouldn’t have a case in the first place. How can we start an investigation, how can we interrogate suspects and how can we have a trial.

Do you think the law should dictate what the sentence for a particular crime should be? Why or why not? Yes, I believe the law should dictate what the sentence for a particular crime should be because we have the right to know. Do you think attorneys should be able to dismiss jurors without stating a specific reason? Why or why not? No, an attorney shouldn’t dismiss a jurors without stating a specific reason because we should know if it was for a good cause. Imagine that it wasn’t a fair cause and his being di