There are also itinerant entrepreneurs who move from department to another seeking to sell their skills to those ready to solicit for them. Though not to be confused with mercenaries, these are usually highly skilled individuals and a majority of them are former public police or military officers. Some people prefer their services to those of federal police because one can negotiate the fee with them. Such officers are also considered especially in cases where the police have all they need but lack the will to pursue the case. The services of these private police are more common and extensive in smaller jurisdictions.
They can do undercover work very well without getting caught and thus increasing their chances of getting the facts more right. Private Sector Hiring Public Police: The private sector which mainly includes companies and corporations, national and multinational, make extensive use of undercover tactics in fighting amongst themselves. Prosecution in such cases is not the main priority and issues such as prevention of property loss, recovering property, denying claims, gathering intelligence and managing employees are the main factors considered in order to increase their profits or level competition with their competitors in the market.
These are services mostly offered by undercover private police but with the current improvement of the public police’ services, there has been a shift of interest and these companies and corporations are soliciting the services of these public police as they are said to be more credible and with lots of regard that they are not-for-profit. The public police have made a tremendous provision of undercover resources, cooperative public agents and sophisticated gadgetry. As a result of this, most companies have even become prosecution-oriented.
There has also been a creation of state-run fraud bureaus to apprehend and investigate fraud offenders and this has served in increasing the corporate sector’s confidence in the government and its federal public police. Powers and Accountability of Private Police: There has been a substantial growth in private policing. This sector has developed and become well taken in the market and thus there has been a drastic improvement in the way that it its services are delivered.
There has been a division of responsibilities for policing between private and public police authorities and the thin line that usually subdivides them has been continued to be increasingly blurred (Stenning, 2000). Private police are usually assessed on the basis of criteria established and therefore there has been confusion about their powers and accountability. It is asserted that the private police usually have no powers and therefore there are some things that they cannot do such as conduct arrests and many other things that the public police can do without a lot of hustles.
Private police are usually not held accountable in comparison to the public police and mostly their findings or services are taken for granted since there is the general notion that these people are not supervised over training and therefore no credibility is rendered unless. An appreciation of their actual power and accountability provides an improved basis for development of sound public policy with respect to private and public policing (Nalla, n. d). New Quasi Public- Private Organizations: These are some permanent forms of public-private police organizations.
These form a sort of relationship such that their services are integrated into one and the two sections work as one in solving cases and fighting crime in these regions of their jurisdiction. These have increased in their prominence such as the National Automobile Theft Bureau which has integrated the services of the public police in fighting the automobile theft and acts as a clearing house for automobile theft information. This bureau uses the public police force in order to apprehend the criminals involved with the theft of automobiles.