Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in America

Professor of history at the University of Carolina, Edwin S. Gaustad is a renowned author of the history of the church. Amongst the dozens of masterpieces he is known for, his exhibits of penmanship such as The Great Awakening and A Religious Story of America are widely acknowledged and known for their contribution to literature in the genre of religious history. The Book For anybody interested in understanding the process of the separation of church from state and how it has been penned down in the pages of time, “Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in America” is nothing less than a gold mine.

Well written, thoroughly researched and clearly narrated, Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in America by Edwin S. Gaustad is perhaps one of the few books that have contributed to not only the vast realm of literature but to the purpose of documentation of history and the cause-effect balance that ensued in it at the same time. In his book, Gaustad takes the reader to the days of the 17th Century and describes the various scenarios that led to the generation and acceptance of controversies regarding literature and the political implications that complimented them.

The book gives a detailed account of the religious that was observed during the process of the foundation of the country (Gaustad). The state and Roger Williams’s views on the separation of church and state Roger Williams was born in the 1603, in the city of London. He left to explore the seven seas when he grew up leaving behind a wife and daughter, he traveled all the way to America, and being a great scholar of Latin, Greek and Hebrew, took great interest in developing civilized colonies and promoting education.

He played a major role as the founder of a colony in Rhode Island, and further founded the Providence Plantations as well, in the 1636. The Brown University for women was later named Pembroke – Cambridge after Roger Williams. A critical analysis of Roger Williams brought to light the personal aspect of his personality. Not only was he tolerant and understanding, but underneath his patent demeanor he was headstrong, opinionated and very firm in his religious views. But apart from that he was not as opinionated as one expected him to be, because he played a big role in the struggle for freedom of thought and conscience.