Generally speaking these three sets of laws are observably in close agreement with each other, in perceptions of both the natures and consequences of laws these laws appear to came into existence through the same path of development. These laws may have been highly verbally disseminated to its subjects; these laws are recorded through the available formal medium of writing available during those times such as stone and steel tablets(Bible History, 2007, p. n. pag. ).
This is true, except for the Law of Eshnunna which happens to be the second oldest set among these three sets of laws. This difference leads this paper to assume that these laws in the first place, no matter how structured and consequence filled they are, are still not considered as formal set of codes of social conduct during their time (Bible History, 2007, p. n. pag. ). Instead, the judicial character present during those times which is highly consultative in nature only uses these laws as collections of royal nature.
The uses of these laws during those times usually lie in the premises that these laws are to be used as primary reference which are still open to be modified to fit better in the nature of the problems(Bible History, 2007, p. n. pag. ). All of these three sets of laws are transformed in different contexts and usages during the time of its existence; this assumption is deemed by this paper as a high priority in this paper because it establishes the fact that these laws are often mistranslated and misunderstood in present time- furthermore on the time of that this paper is written.
Consequently, it should be noted that the levels that these laws served as mere references may differ on the times that it has existed. For the sake of organization, please note that the laws which will be compared in light with these three sets of laws are laws that involve adultery, physical injuries and bearing of false witness. These cases are chosen because of its natures that may show a holistic understanding of these sets of laws. Adultery is a crime deemed by this paper as a crime against the proper moral conducts of society.
Physical injury is to be treated by this paper as offenses against the individual rights of the other members of society. And lastly, bearing of false witness is a crime against the social obligations of an individual. Properly explaining these different cases will lead to the formulation of the similarities and differences of these three sets of laws; using these cases it is also deemed that this paper will arrive at a conclusive generalization whether these laws manifest an evolution of laws in the Mesopotamia.