This is where the Arizona law enforcement community attempts to diffuse the situation. Escobar remembers growing up in a Tucson environment where cops questioned him about his status. He insists it had nothing to do with an on-going investigation, but just because of what he looked like. (Esquival 1) “I can still remember the street where it happened,” he said. “They stopped me and started asking me what my legal status was. It scared the heck out of me. I was thinking, ‘How am I going to prove that I’m here legally? ‘ That’s the experience I felt, being afraid, wondering, ‘Have I done anything wrong?
‘ (Esquival 1) That is the exact experience Escobar wants to disable as often as possible. He wants people to freely exchange ideas and concerns with him. His hope is not having the law discourage free speech and raise fears among minority groups they could face penalties for being captured. (Esquival 1) The other reason this law is not racist is how the law was written. If the intent of the immigration law was to tease a certain race or group, then it would be deemed illegal because of Border Patrol 4 the discrimination statutes on the books.
This law targets people here illegally and under false pretenses. Those people do not have rights under U. S. law and would be subject to deportation if found. (Maiman 1) As the author wrote to back up his argument, “Arizona is a border state with Mexico. It’s heavily impacted by illegal immigration. There are nearly half a million illegal immigrants in a state with a relatively small population. They cause a problem for Arizona and Arizona wants to do something about that. I don’t see anything in that line of reasoning that is racist.
All of those things are legitimate concerns, are they not? ” (Maiman 1) Say one of the states had an influx of people coming in from Canada. One of those areas, for example North Dakota, decided to enact similar laws preventing the number of Canadians from entering our country illegally. The law is not saying that Canadians are unwelcome guests to America. It would be saying that those who are trying to enter and stay in America as an illegal alien are doing so at their own peril. (Mainman 1) Holder said that profiling would not be tolerated within the Arizona’s police departments.
That part needs to be driven home and the hope that officers would do the right thing hangs in the balance. (Tappen 1) The attorney general echoed the same issue Escobar had in dealing with minorities who feel they will be unfairly targeted. Police need such groups to be their eyes and ears. They will feel uncomfortable approaching police officers if their goal is to find and deport anyone, especially those of Mexican-American persuasion. Police officers are not happy that the work they did in forming relationships with minorities will dissolve once the new law takes Border Patrol 5 effect soon.
(Tappen 1) What can we learned from this law? The state is intended to keep the public safe. Citizens spend millions of dollars in taxes to ensure they are safe from criminals and the incoming immigrant population. Arizona is one of several U. S. States that borders Mexico. Like their neighboring states, Arizona is attempting to right a wrong in which people are getting in without repercussions or threat of punishment. Police officers are also trying to remain safe from those entering the country illegally. They do not know if the people they are speaking with will pull out and use a weapon against them.
They also do not know if they are part of a Mexican drug cartel looking to off-load product in an unsuspecting neighborhood. They need to do their jobs thoroughly. Officers are also sworn to do their jobs. As one officer said in the Times, police officers have an obligation to uphold the law even if they do not personally agree to it. If someone looks like they are from out of town and looking for a place to stay, then it is up to the officer to take action. Do they send them directions to the next hotel or ask them for their paper work. It’s a difficult but necessary component to determining the next course of action.
The law is not racist because it goes after people who are not suppose to be here in the first place. It is not intended to look at a minority and pick on them. The point was to help stare down immigration and do something about the issue. Giver Arizona credit for taking a worthwhile stand against this controversial topic. Border Patrol 6 Works Cited Esquivel, Paloma. “Two police officers combat Arizona immigration law–Both feel betrayed by the legislation and say it will interfere with a fundamental law enforcement mission: protecting people.
” The Los Angeles Times, 6 May, 2010. Maiman, Bruce. “Arizona’s immigration law is not racist. ” Examiner. com/Providence. 27 April, 2010. Retrieved May 18, 2010 from: http://www. examiner. com/x-15870-Populist-Examiner~y2010m4d27-Arizonas-immigration-law-is-not-racist Tapper, Jake. “Holder: AZ Immigration Law Not Racist” ABC News Political Punch, 9 May, 2010. Retrieved May 18, 2010 from: http://blogs. abcnews. com/politicalpunch/2010/05/holder-az-immigration-law-not-racist. html