In what situation would breaking the law become plausible? What circumstances will justify a person’s actions when they decide breaking the law becomes a necessary matter? The variables are essential. What type of crime was committed? Does it affect anybody else negatively? Whenever the law is broken, the potential perpetrator is brought to court. The justice system and its judges then decide if he or she is guilty. Depending on their decision will result in either punishment or absolution. In minor cases it’s possible to be looked over and favor the defense, but if a severe case is brought to court, it gets much more complicated.
Who’s to say the law itself is justifiable? Movements and reforms have taken place in order to create a fair and just law enforcement system. There have been movements such as the civil rights movement, women’s suffrage, and gay rights, all forms of protest against the law. Those individuals were able to use their right to freedom of speech to express an inequality and inadequacy in the law. Due to ongoing democracy in the United States, modifications have been made to coincide with our natural rights. Is the situation a matter of life or death?
The niches on this topic can extend variously. If someone had complete intentions of murder, and the evidence is valid, murder in defense to the offender may not have punishment. Again, the courts would determine all aspects of the situation. The defendant might slip up and admit to a fault or reasons as to why someone was trying to kill him or her in the first place, although nothing justifies the intent. In the predicament of and actually saying, “In defense for my life,” would not entirely justify the action.
Independent choices and the rights of an individual are another factor that ties into death. Assisted suicide is punishable by law. When it comes down to self-affliction, who’s to dictate what someone wants to do to upon themselves? Drug abuse has also been an indication of inflicting harm to oneself. People will go out of their way in order to satisfy their addictions. A person who is intent on taking drugs will find a way to get the prescription of the drug, buy it over the counter, or go as far as making the drug in their homes.
Mal-practice and the distribution of drugs illegally can result in jail time, but what if the person is prescribed the medication? What if they enjoy abusing their prescribed drugs, causing no harm to anyone but themselves? What about the damage being done to the world? Ongoing litter that goes on every day, every hour, every second that almost all can be held accountable for. The pollution from everyone’s cars, or means of transportation, or simply the butt of the billions or trillions that smoke cigarettes, contribute to a contaminated world.
How can the law justify anyone’s actions when it seems that corruption inhabits all suggestive vindications? Business is an important part of the United States, what people do with their garbage is inevitable. There are much more serious crimes taking place that those in charge of enforcing the law are busy looking for bigger things to bust. When it comes down to the main question, “Is breaking the law for a cause justifiable? ” every situation depends on the motives of the person. There is a reason behind every action whether it have a good purpose or a chemical imbalance.
Regardless of the crime, if not arrested, a summons or ticket is distributed with a choice of pay the fine, or appear in court to explain. Most of the time, if police enforce a ticket upon an offender it is because they do not believe a valid reason will substantiate as to why the law has been broken. Though officers have a good eye to catch an offender, this is not always the dispute. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks are both prime examples of disobeying the law, but peacefully. They were ready to reap the consequences although they were fighting for something they believed in.
Even though the law was unjust, it was still the law and they knew they would be punished. They accepted the punishment without causing a riot, and caused no harm towards anyone. They persisted and were continuously oppressed. Fighting for justice. Works Cited Zerbisias, Antonia. “When Breaking the Law Is Justified. ” Common Dreams. The Toronto Star, 10 June 2011. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Cohen, Carl. “Bad Arguments Defending Racial Preference. ” Academic Questions 21. 3 (2008): 288-295. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Apr. 2013.