Author E. M. Forster’s notion that owning too much property leads to revolution is a worthy argument. After all, items of materialistic items have been, in certain instances, accredited to accounts of extreme misfortune. However, I beg to differ being that property and prosperity is an American dream. To own a home, in my opinion, is a sign of stability. Owning a property exempts one from paying rent or a monthly token for living purposes and enables one to virtually ultimate privacy.
As sole owner of a property a person is liable to become immersed in the feeling of ownership, but are unforeseen consequences great enough that it is not worth the effort put in to acquiring a place one may call their own. To own a property has long been considered one of the ultimate achievements in life, along beside wealth and offspring. Forster states in his essay that “property produces men of weight, and it was a man of weight who failed to get into the kingdom of heaven.
” In saying that he meant that along with ownership of a property come greater responsibility and less flexibility which in other words is equivalent to Forster’s definition of weight. Many Americans, my-self included, work countless years in life to be able to afford the luxury of owning a property. It is the reward of working hard. Yes, one would imagine that a substantial amount of assets would be more difficult to manage, further explaining Forster’s notion of his “wood” causing him to feel heavy.
The difference between the so called weight of common items such as phones and other ordinary devices and items and that of a portion of land or a home, cost being a factor, up keeping and mobility. Other things can be transported and easily maintenance where as a home or land cannot. Owning a home goes hand in hand with the stability viewed as required to start a family or to simply be prepared when the time arrives. Stability, in regards to home ownership, ensures that one has a permanent place of residence, not to mention exempting them from paying rent toward another person’s benefit.
People don’t usually grow up aspiring to spend their hard earned funds for temporary use of someone else’s property. Forster said that “we have not yet learned to manage our materialism and carnality properly. ” What he meant was that human nature drives us to over exaggerate our actual needs and to always want more despite already having. Ownership of a home differs from that of the usual materialism in that it serves as an actual necessity; a need and not merely a possessive desire. Privacy is another positive aspect of owning your own home.
When in the comfort of one’s own home or on one’s own land a person can guarantee themselves complete seclusion at any given time. Evidently Forster’s experience yielded no such feelings. Foster’s attitude toward ownership of his wood was slightly different though, confirmed when he stumbled across a bird. Foster thought of the bird as being a part of his property since it was on his land. The author felt as though he did not have complete control over his wood. Foster was shocked to learn that the bird actually didn’t belong to him.
Thus confirmed in the author’s statement that “the bird took alarm for the second time and flew clean away from us all, under the belief that it belonged to itself. ” In my opinion, a slight interruption of nature from time to time should not infringe on one’s view of privacy nor ownership. An owner of a property is subject to becoming consumed in the feeling of possession causing grave repercussions, but unforeseen consequences should not prevent one from moving forward toward dreams of property ownership. E. M.
Foster’s attitude about his “wood” is vividly portrayed in his essay, noting a number of negative consequences of possessing a portion of land. He seems as if his land owning experience was dissatisfying. This explains people’s nature to always want more than is necessary. He also states that his “wood” makes him feel heavy, as in adding on greater responsibilities. I disagree with Foster’s notion that owning a property is an unpleasant experience. Property and prosperity for some are lifelong accomplishments.
People strive on a day to day basis toward being successful in these aspects of life. Privacy is also an afforded luxury of land ownership that the author of the passage failed to gratify. The privacy of a home enables one to seclude themself at will. Therefore, the effects of ownership could be a dream for one and a nightmare for another. It is what you make it out to be. Forster, E. M. “My Wood”. Readings for Writers. Wadsworth Publishing Co. , 2010. P. 185. 12 edition, English.