Codes of conduct for criminal justice professionals
Each and every given profession is guided by a set of well articulated rules and regulations. In practice, these precepts are designed to help in streamlining and equally defining the repute of the given discipline. These principals equally apply to the practice of criminal justice professionals who happen to include police, corrections, lawyers, judges, and probation and parole officers. It is instrumental to reflect on the broader aspects by which the codes of conduct pertaining to these disciplines are anchored. However, examining each and every practice individually, a number of contrasting aspects are apparent. Technically, the dissimilar mechanisms employed to enforce these codes strongly attests to the fact that, each discipline has its own written code of ethics and they are dissimilar even in the way they are enforced (Sanders, 2003). This is due to the fact that, all disciplines allied to criminal justice professions are guided by a number of unrelated codes of conduct which are more than often developed to reflect the requirements and the application of the given area in regard to the rest of the society. In their specialized activities, criminal justice professionals are dedicated to enhancing the broad well-being of society and of those and cluster within it.
Members of these professions are principally careful to shun ineffectual, unethical or dishonest use of criminal justice comprehension. For instance, judges who play an integral role in regard to the principles of criminal justice, tremendously upholds the laid down code of ethics to the letter and spirit .They make out the great latency for damage that is connected with the knowledge of criminal justice, therefore, they do not intentionally place the safety of themselves or other citizens in danger in their specialized work. Reflecting on the aspects of code of ethics in relation to police force, it would be pivotal to argue that, the police force as a segment of criminal justice profession, significantly requires a thorough ethical facelift (Good, 2003).
This is due to the fact that, they have soiled their image due to their inhuman handling of suspects as well as being involved in unethical and corrupt practices such as soliciting for bribes and kickbacks from law breakers. And this has overseen the precepts of human rights as stipulated within the codes of ethics being abused or equally neglected. Therefore, am of opinion that, as an issue within the precepts of code of ethics, it needs a massive facelift in order to be effective and relevant due to the changing workplace trends. Members of the criminal justice professions are required to esteem the rights, decorum and significance of all citizens.
In their work, criminal justice professionals are predominantly careful to esteem the rights, decorum and worth of criminal justice workforce, crime fatalities and those indicted or convicted of committing felonies, as well as of scholars and research subjects. According to the criminal justice code of ethics, they are not permitted to discriminate either on or the basis of age, sex, race, traditions, general origin, creed, gender orientation, health form or family status. They have to be sensitive to personal, cultural and character dissimilarity among citizens (De Vries, et al, 2000).
More so, while handling daily work encounters, reporting violations by colleagues, the code of ethics stipulates that, the involved personnel have to recognize the rights of other citizens and groups to embrace values, stance and views that are dissimilar from their hold. In that position, the codes of ethics with respect to how the criminal justice system really operates can be said to be totally realistic and workable. All in all, despite the dissimilar precepts, they have almost a common enforcement mechanism.
De Vries, Paul, et al. (2000). Ethics. Boston: Pearson.
Good, H. (2003). Desperately Seeking.Lanham: Scarecrow.
Sanders, K. (2003). Ethics and Journalism.London: Sage