RESPONDENT:Barrett
LOCATION:Ohio House of Representatives
DOCKET NO.: 88-2035
DECIDED BY: Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)
LOWER COURT: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
CITATION: 494 US 638 (1990)
ARGUED: Jan 17, 1990
DECIDED: Mar 21, 1990
ADVOCATES:
Bonita L. Kneeland – on behalf of the Petitioner
Laurence H. Tribe – on behalf of the Respondents
Question
Media for Adams Fruit Company, Inc. v. Barrett
Audio Transcription for Oral Argument – January 17, 1990 in Adams Fruit Company, Inc. v. Barrett
Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement – March 21, 1990 in Adams Fruit Company, Inc. v. Barrett
William H. Rehnquist:
The opinion of the Court in No. 88-2035, Adams Fruit Company versus Barrett will be announced by Justice Marshall.
Thurgood Marshall:
This case is here on writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
In an opinion filed with the Clerk today, we hold that the receipt of workman’s compensation benefits under state law does not preempt actions under the Agricultural Workers Protection Act.
We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the Eleventh Circuit.
