The brachiosaurus had a very long neck, a small head and a short tail, compared to other sauropods

Brachiosaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur from the Jurassic Morrison Formation of North America. It was first described by Elmer S. Riggs in 1903 from fossils found in the Grand River Canyon (now Colorado River) of western Colorado, in the United States. Riggs named the dinosaur Brachiosaurus altithorax, declaring it “the largest known dinosaur”. Brachiosaurus had a proportionally long neck, small skull, and large overall size, all of which are typical for sauropods.However, the proportions of Brachiosaurus are unlike most sauropods – the forelimbs were longer than the hindlimbs, which resulted in a steeply inclined trunk. Also, while the tail is a typical long dinosaur tail, it was relatively short for a sauropod. Brachiosaurus is the namesake genus of the family Brachiosauridae, which includes a handful of other similar sauropods. Much of what is known by laypeople about Brachiosaurus is in fact based on Giraffatitan brancai, a species of brachiosaurid dinosaur from the Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania that was originally described by German paleontologist Werner Janensch as a species of Brachiosaurus.Recent research shows that the differences between the type species of Brachiosaurus and the Tendaguru material are significant enough that the African material should be placed in a separate genus. Several other potential species of Brachiosaurus have been described from Africa and Europe, but none of them are thought to belong to Brachiosaurus at this time. Brachiosaurus is one of the rarer sauropods of the Morrison Formation. The type specimen of B. altithorax is still the most complete specimen, and only a relative handful of other specimens are thought to belong to the genus.It is regarded as a high browser, probably cropping or nipping vegetation as high as possibly 9 metres (30 ft) off of the ground. Unlike other sauropods, and its depiction in the film Jurassic Park, it was unsuited for rearing on its hindlimbs. It has been used as an example of a dinosaur that was most likely ectothermic due to its large size and the corresponding need for forage, but more recent research finds it to have been warm-blooded. Discovery and history Elmer S. Riggs’ preparator, H. W. Menke, lying by a Brachiosaurus altithorax humerus during the excavation in 1900 The genus Brachiosaurus, and type species B.altithorax, are based on a partial postcranial skeleton from Fruita, in the valley of the Colorado River of western Colorado. [15] This specimen was collected from rocks of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation[16] in 1900 by Elmer S. Riggs and his crew from the Field Columbian Museum (now the Field Museum of Natural History) of Chicago. [6] It is currently cataloged as FMNH P 25107. [5] Riggs and company were working in the area as a result of favorable correspondence between Riggs and S. M. Bradbury, a dentist in nearby Grand Junction.In 1899, Riggs had sent inquiries to rural locations in the western United States concerning fossil finds, and Bradbury, an amateur collector himself, reported that dinosaur bones had been collected in the area since 1885. [15] It was Riggs’ field assistant H. W. Menke who found FMNH P 25107,[6] on July 4, 1900. [17] The locality, Riggs Quarry 13, was found on a small hill later known as Riggs Hill; it is marked by a plaque. Additional Brachiosaurus fossils are reported on Riggs Hill, but other fossil finds on the hill have been vandalized.[17][18] Riggs published a short report in 1901, noting the unusual length of the humerus compared to the femur and the extreme overall size and the resulting giraffe-like proportions, as well as the lesser development of the tail, but did not publish a name for the new dinosaur. [19] The titles of Riggs (1901) and (1903) suggested that the specimen was the largest known dinosaur. [6][19] Riggs followed his 1903 publication that named Brachiosaurus altithorax[6] with a more detailed description in a monograph in 1904. [10]The Felch Quarry skull as reconstructed by Carpenter and Tidwell The Fruita skeleton was not the first discovery of Brachiosaurus bones, although it was the first to be recognized as belonging to a new and distinct animal. In 1883, a sauropod skull was found near Garden Park, Colorado, at Felch Quarry 1, and was sent to Othniel Charles Marsh (of “Bone Wars” fame). [5] Marsh incorporated the skull into his skeletal restoration of “Brontosaurus” (now Apatosaurus). [5][20] It eventually became part of the collections of the National Museum of Natural History, as USNM 5730.[5] In the 1970s, when Jack McIntosh and David Berman were working on the issue of the true skull of Apatosaurus, they reevaluated the Garden Park skull as more similar to Camarasaurus. [21] It was described and recognized as a Brachiosaurus skull in 1998 by Kenneth Carpenter and Virginia Tidwell, intermediate in form between Camarasaurus and Giraffatitan brancai (then still considered to be B. brancai). [22] Because there are no overlapping parts between this skull and FMNH P 25107, it cannot be confidently assigned to a species,[5][22] so it is classified as Brachiosaurus sp.[22] Additional discoveries of Brachiosaurus material in North America have been uncommon and consist of a handful of bones. Material has been described from Colorado,[5][23][24][25] Oklahoma,[5][26] Utah,[5][23] and Wyoming,[5][8] and undescribed material has been mentioned from several other sites. [5][16] One of these specimens, a shoulder blade from Dry Mesa Quarry, Colorado, is one of the specimens at the center of the Supersaurus/Ultrasauros issue of the 1980s and 1990s. In 1985, James A.Jensen described disarticulated sauropod remains from the quarry as belonging to several taxa, including the new genera Supersaurus and Ultrasaurus,[27] the latter renamed Ultrasauros shortly thereafter because another sauropod already had the name. [28] Later study showed that the “ultrasaur” material mostly belonged to Supersaurus, although the shoulder blade did not. Because the holotype of Ultrasauros, a back vertebra, was one of the specimens that was actually from Supersaurus, the name Ultrasauros is a synonym of Supersaurus. The shoulder blade is now assigned to Brachiosaurus, but the species is uncertain.[5][24] In addition, the Dry Mesa “ultrasaur” was not as large as had been thought; the dimensions of the shoulder’s coracoid bone indicate that the animal was smaller than Riggs’ original specimen of Brachiosaurus. [5] Etymology Riggs derived the genus name from the Greek brachion/??????? meaning “arm” and sauros/?????? meaning “lizard”, because he realized that the length of the arms was unusual for a sauropod. [6] The species epithet “altithorax” was chosen because of the unusually deep and wide chest cavity, from Latin altus meaning “deep” and Greek thorax/?????(Latin thorax), meaning “breastplate, cuirass, corslet”. [29] Species Brachiosaurus altithorax Holotype material during excavation FMNH P 25107, the holotype of both the genus Brachiosaurus and the species B. altithorax, consists of the right humerus (upper arm bone), the right femur (thigh bone), the right ilium (a hip bone), the right coracoid (a shoulder bone), the sacrum (fused vertebrae of the hip), the last seven thoracic (trunk) and two caudal (tail) vertebrae, and a number of ribs.[5][6][19] Riggs described the coracoid as from the left side of the body,[6][10][19] but restudy has shown it to be a right coracoid. [5] Other assigned species “B. ” atalaiensis: Originally described by de Lapparent and Zbyszewski,[30] this material’s reference to Brachiosaurus was doubted by Upchurch, Barret and Dodson,[1] who listed it as an unnamed brachiosaurid, and placed in its own genus Lusotitan by Antunes and Mateus. [31] De Lapparent and Zbyszewski described a series of remains but did not designate a type specimen.Antunes and Mateus selected a partial postcranial skeleton (MIGM 4978, 4798, 4801–4810, 4938, 4944, 4950, 4952, 4958, 4964–4966, 4981–4982, 4985, 8807, 8793–87934) as a lectotype; this specimen includes 28 vertebrae, chevrons, ribs, a possible shoulder blade, humeri, forearm bones, partial left pelvis, lower leg bones, and part of the right ankle. The low neural spines, the prominent deltopectoral crest of the humerus (a muscle attachment site on the upper arm bone), the elongated humerus (very long and slender), and the long axis of the ilium tilted upward indicate that Lusotitan is a brachiosaurid. [31] “B.” brancai: Janensch based his description on “Skelett S” (skeleton S) from Tendaguru,[32] but later realized that it comprised two partial individuals: S I and S II. [33] He did not designate them as a syntype series, nor specify a lectotype, and Taylor proposed the larger and more complete S II (MB. R. 2181) as the lectotype. [5] It includes, among other bones, several dorsal (trunk) vertebrae, the left scapula, both coracoids, both sternals (breastbones), both humeri, both ulna and radii (lower arm bones), a right hand, a partial left hand, both pubes (a hip bone) and the right femur, tibia and fibula (shank bones).A re-assessment of the relation between the African and American brachiosaur material indicates that a separate generic name is warranted for the Tendaguru material, meaning that it is now considered to belong to Giraffatitan. [5][7] “B. ” fraasi: erected by Janensch in 1914, but later synonymized with “B. ” brancai;[33] this material now belongs to Giraffatitan. [5] “B. ” nougaredi: This species is known from fragmentary remains discovered in eastern Algeria, in the Sahara Desert. The present type material consists of a sacrum and some of the left metacarpals and phalanges.Found at the discovery site but not collected were partial bones of the left forearm, wrist bones, a right shin bone, and fragments that may have come from metatarsals. [34] de Lapparent, who described and named the material in 1960, reported the discovery locality as being in the Late Jurassic–age Taouratine Series (he assigned the rocks this age in part because of the presumed presence of Brachiosaurus),[34] but more recent review assigns it to the “Continental intercalaire,” which is considered to be of Albian age (late Early Cretaceous, significantly younger).[1] This material was found disjointed over an area of several hundred meters. [34] The material probably does not represent a single species. [35] Referred material Front limb bone (humerus) from Potter Creek, USNM 21903 Taylor (2009) lists a number of specimens referred to Brachiosaurus. These include some material, e. g. , a humerus from Potter Creek and some Dry Mesa material (the latter partly described as Ultrasauros by Jensen), that are either clearly not brachiosaurid in origin, or at least not clearly referable to Brachiosaurus.[5] In contrast, a cervical (neck) vertebra and the skull mentioned above may belong to either B. altithorax or an as-yet unknown brachiosaurid from North America. [5] The cervical was found near Jensen, Utah, by Jensen,[23] and – if it belongs to Brachiosaurus – is one of a handful of neck vertebrae known for American brachiosaurids. [5] There is no unambiguous material of the skull, neck, anterior dorsal (forward trunk) region, distal (lower) limbs or feet. [5] More recently, Carballido et al. (2012) reported on a nearly complete postcranial skeleton of a juvenile sauropod (approximately 2 metres (6.6 ft) long) from the Morrison Formation of the Bighorn Basin, north-central Wyoming. This specimen was originally thought to belong to a diplodocid, but the authors reinterpreted it as representing a brachiosaurid, probably Brachiosaurus altithorax. [36] There was ample material referred to “B. ” brancai in the collections of the Museum fur Naturkunde Berlin, some of which was destroyed during World War II. Other material was transferred to other institution throughout Germany, some of which was also destroyed.Additional specimens are likely among the material collected by the British Museum of Natural History’s Tendaguru expedition. [37] Much or all of this material probably belongs to Giraffatitan, although some may represent a new brachiosaurid. [38] Separation of Giraffatitan When describing the brachiosaurid material from Tendaguru in 1914, Janensch listed a number of differences and commonalities between them and B. altithorax. [32] In three further publications in 1929,[33] 1950 [39] and 1961[40] Janensch compared the two species in more detail, listing 13 putative shared characters.[5] Of these, however, only four appear to be valid, while six pertain to more inclusive groups than Brachiosauridae, and the rest are either difficult to assess or refer to material that is not Brachiosaurus. [5] In 1988, Gregory Paul published a new reconstruction of the skeleton of “B. ” brancai, highlighting a number of differences in proportion between it and B. altithorax. Chief among them is a difference in the way the trunk vertebrae vary: they are fairly uniform in B. altithorax, but vary widely in the African material.Paul believed that the limb and girdle elements of both species were very similar, and therefore suggested to separate them not at genus, but only at subgenus level. [7] Giraffatitan was raised to genus level by Olshevsky without comment. [28] A detailed study of all material, including the limb and girdle bones, by Michael Taylor in 2009 found that there are significant differences between Brachiosaurus altithorax and the Tendaguru material in all elements known from both species. Taylor found 26 distinct osteological (bone-based) characters, a larger difference than that between, e. g., Diplodocus and Barosaurus, and therefore argued that the African material should be placed in its own genus, Giraffatitan, as G. brancai. [5] An important difference between the two genera is the overall body shape, with Brachiosaurus having a 23% longer dorsal (trunk) vertebrate series and a 20 to 25% longer and also taller tail. [5] Paleoecology With the removal of the East African Giraffatitan, Brachiosaurus is known only from the Morrison Formation of western North America. [5] The Morrison Formation is interpreted as a semiarid environment with distinct wet and dry seasons,[41][42] and flat floodplains.[41] Vegetation varied from gallery forests (river–lining forests in otherwise treeless settings) of conifers, tree ferns, and ferns, to fern savannas with rare Araucaria-like trees. [43] Several other sauropod genera were present in the Morrison Formation, with differing body proportions and feeding adaptations. [8] Among these were Apatosaurus, Barosaurus, Camarasaurus, Diplodocus, Haplocanthosaurus, and Supersaurus. [8][44] Brachiosaurus was one of the less abundant Morrison Formation sauropods.In a survey of over 200 fossil localities, John Foster reported 12 specimens of the genus, comparable to Barosaurus (13) and Haplocanthosaurus (12), but far fewer than Apatosaurus (112), Camarasaurus (179), and Diplodocus (98). [8] Brachiosaurus fossils are found only in the lower-middle part of the expansive Morrison Formation (stratigraphic zones 2-4), dated to about 154-153 million years ago,[45] unlike many other types of sauropod which have been found throughout the formation. [8] Paleobiology Neck position Mounted skeleton in O’Hare International AirportIn contrast to most other sauropods, brachiosaurids had an inclined back, due to their long forelimbs. Therefore, if the neck exited the body in a straight line, it already pointed upwards. [5][46][47][48] The exact angle is influenced by how the pectoral girdle is reconstructed, that is how the shoulder blades are placed on the ribcage. [46][47][48] The mobility of the neck was reconstructed as quite low by Stevens and Parrish,[46][47][48] while other researchers like Paul and Christian and Dzemski argued for more flexible necks. [7][49] Feeding ecologyBrachiosaurus is thought to have been a high browser, feeding on foliage well above the ground. Even if it did not hold its neck near vertical, and instead had a straighter neck, its head height may still have been over 9 metres (30 ft) above the ground. [2][8] It probably fed mostly on foliage above 5 metres (16 ft). This does not preclude the possibility that it also fed lower at times, between 3 to 5 metres (9. 8 to 16 ft) up. [2] Its diet likely consisted of ginkgos, conifers, tree ferns, and large cycads, with intake estimated at 200 to 400 kilograms (440 to 880 lb) of plant matter daily.[2] However, more recent studies estimate that ~240 kilograms (530 lb) of plant matter would have been sufficient to feed a 70 metric tons (77 short tons) sauropod,[50] so Brachiosaurus may have required only about 120 kilograms (260 lb) of fodder a day. Brachiosaur feeding involved simple up–and–down jaw motion. The teeth were arranged to shear material as they closed, and were probably used to crop and/or nip vegetation. [51] It has repeatedly been suggested, e. the movie Jurassic Park, that Brachiosaurus could rear into a bipedal or tripodal (with tail support) pose to feed. [7] However, a detailed physical modelling-based analysis of sauropod rearing capabilities by Heinrich Mallison showed that while many sauropods could rear, the unusual brachiosaurid body shape and limb length ratio made them exceptionally ill suited for rearing. The forward position of the center of mass would have led to problems with stability, and required unreasonably large forces in the hips to obtain an upright posture.Brachiosaurus would also have gained relatively little from rearing (only 33% more feeding height), compared to other sauropods, for which a bipedal pose may have tripled the feeding height. [52] Metabolism Like all sauropods, Brachiosaurus was homeothermic (maintaining a stable internal temperature) and endothermic (controlling body temperature through internal means), meaning that it was able to actively control its body temperature (“warm-blooded”), producing the necessary heat through a high basic metabolic rate of its cells.[53] In the past, Brachiosaurus has been used an example of a dinosaur for which endothermy is unlikely, because of the combination of great size (leading to overheating) and great caloric needs to fuel endothermy. [54] However, these calculations were based on incorrect assumptions about the available cooling surfaces (the large air sacs were not known), and a grossly inflated body mass. These inaccuracies resulted in the overestimation of heat production and the underestimation of heat loss. [53] The large nasal arch has been postulated as an adaptation for cooling the brain, as a surface for evaporative cooling of the blood.[54] In culture Newly unveiled Apatosaurus mount in Hall 35 of Field Columbian Museum (now Field Museum of Natural History) with Brachiosaurus holotype and other dinosaur bones in glass cases in background, 1909 Preparation of P 25107, the holotype of Brachiosaurus, began in the fall of 1900 shortly after it was collected by Elmer Riggs for the Field Museum of Natural History (Chicago). As the preparation of each bone was finished, it was put on display in a glass case in Hall 35 of the Fine Arts Palace of the Worlds Columbian Exposition, Field Museum’s first home.All the bones were on display by 1908 when Field Museum’s newly mounted Apatosaurus was unveiled. However, no mount was attempted because only 20% of the skeleton had been recovered. In 1993, the holotype bones were molded and cast, and the missing bones were sculpted based on Giraffatitan material in Berlin. This plastic skeleton was mounted and, in 1994, put on display at the north end of Stanley Field Hall, the main exhibit hall of the Field Museum’s current building. The real bones of the holotype were put on exhibit in two large glass cases at at either end of the mounted cast.The mount stood until 1999, when it was moved to the B Concourse of United Airlines’ Terminal One in O’Hare International Airport to make room for the museum’s newly acquired T. rex, “SUE”. [55] At the same time, the Field Museum mounted a second plastic cast of the skeleton (designed for outside use) and it has been on display outside the museum on the NW terrace ever since. The only real bones currently on display are the humerus and two dorsals in the Mesozoic Hall of the Field Museum’s Evolving Planet exhibit.[56] Brachiosaurus is one of the best-known dinosaurs amongst both paleontologists and the general public. A main belt asteroid, 1991 GX7, has been named 9954 Brachiosaurus in honor of the genus. [57][58] The genus has been featured in many films and television programs, most notably the Jurassic Park and Walking with Dinosaurs series. The digital model of Brachiosaurus used in Jurassic Park went on to become the starting point for the ronto models in the 1997 special edition of the science fiction film Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. [59] References